' US Embassy Reportedly Warns of a Specific Threat to Attack Entebbe Airport by Unknown Terrorist Group '

#AceWorldNews – AFRICA (Kamapala) – July 04 – The US embassy in Uganda reportedly warned Thursday of a “specific threat” to attack Entebbe Airport, which serves the country’s capital, Kampala.


“There is a specific threat to attack Entebbe International Airport by an unknown terrorist group today, July 3rd, between the hours of 2100-2300 (0400-0600 Friday Sydney time),”the statement published on the embassy’s website in the east African nation said.

It said citizens planning to travel at that time might consider reviewing their arrangements.

It followed a warning by US authorities on Wednesday that security at Middle East and European airports with direct US flights needed to be stepped up.

#ANS2014

#africa, #entebbe, #kampala

A Reason The US Could Go To War With Syria

american flag

american flag (Photo credit: osipovva)

There are two possible arguments for intervention without Security Council authorization, but they both require an extension of recognized principles beyond the limits heretofore applied to them. The first is based on a limited right of humanitarian intervention to aid groups held captive or subjected to grave physical danger. The justification for humanitarian intervention is strongest when the intervening states are acting to protect their own nationals, as in the case of Israel’s 1976 raid to release its nationals being held hostage at the airport in Entebbe, Uganda. The extended argument would be that in exceptional cases where peaceful means of alleviating a humanitarian crisis inflicted by a state on its own nationals have failed, and where the Security Council has recognized a threat to international peace, forceful intervention would be lawful so long as it is proportional to the situation.

The second argument is based on an extension of the right of collective self-defense. That right is recognized by Article 51 of the U.N. Charter, if the Security Council has not acted to deal with an armed attack. The right of self-defense, though, has traditionally been regarded as legitimate only in the case of an armed attack on a state. Even if the Kosovo authorities have requested self-defense help from NATO, since Kosovo is not a state under international law, the right of collective self-defense would have to be stretched to apply here. The argument for stretching it would stress the international community’s recognition of the Kosovars as an entity entitled to a substantial measure of autonomy (and thus entitled not only to defend itself, but also to request others to help, so long as the help is proportional to the situation).

Should you wish to use the text above, please added the  with thanks and courtesy for use of text from http://www.asil.org/insigh30.cfm

About the Author: 
Frederic L. Kirgis is Law School Association Alumni Professor at Washington and Lee University School of Law. He has written a book and several articles on United Nations law, and is a member of the Board of Editors of the American Journal of International Law.

The purpose of ASIL Insights is to provide concise and informed background for developments of interest to the international community. The American Society of  International Law does not take positions on substantive issues, including the ones discussed  in this Insight.

ASIL Insights may be found on the ASIL Web Site.
Educational copying is permitted with due acknowledgement.

Thank you, #peace

United Nations Security Council 联合国安理会

United Nations Security Council 联合国安理会 (Photo credit: Yang and Yun’s Album)

Editor {Ace News Group}

#acenewsservices, #american-journal-of-international-law, #being-held-hostage, #entebbe, #entebbe-uganda, #flag-photo, #humanitarian-intervention, #israel, #kosovo, #libya, #middle-east, #politics, #security-council, #syria, #united-nations-charter, #united-nations-security-council