#UK #G4’S The BBC has seen a presentation stating they earned more than £2.4m in pre-tax profits in 2013 for providing ‘ Tax Payer ‘ funded private facilities for two immigration removal centres #AceNewsDesk reports

#AceNewsReport – Sept.14: Documents seen by the BBC’s Panorama suggest G4S has been making significant profits from running two immigration removal centres near Gatwick Airport #AceNewsDesk reports

One, Brook House, was the focus of a Panorama investigation, which exposed chaos, bullying and the abusive treatment of detainees by some staff………The BBC  has seen a presentation stating G4S earned more than £2.4m in pre-tax profits from the centre in 2013…….G4S said the sum was “significantly overstated”……The company said the figures were based on “incomplete information“, adding: “The Home Office has full access to financial information regarding the contract performance….Substantial savings have been passed on to the Home Office over the life of the Brook House contract.”…….Labour’s Yvette Cooper, who chairs the home affairs select committee, said #G4S had “serious questions” to answer about its profits…….”Clearly it would be unacceptable for a private company to be making excessive profits out of a contract where there appears to have been abuse taking place,” she said……..The BBC has seen a slide presentation, dated January 2014, that was shown to senior G4S managers…….It states that in 2013 the company made a profit of just under 20% before tax on the running of Brook House Immigration Removal Centre near Gatwick – a figure of more than £2.4m.

It is understood that the original agreement with the Home Office envisaged that the company would make significantly less……The BBC has also seen more financial documents for a number of years from the period 2009 to 2016 which suggest the company has been making significant profits……The slide presentation states that in 2013 Tinsley House Immigration Removal centre, which shares the site at Gatwick with Brook House, made a profit of 27.3% before tax, about £1.5m.

‘Excess’ profits

Separately, a former senior manager with the company has told the BBC that he sat in meetings where those profits were discussed…..Nathan Ward, who quit the company in April 2014, said profits were “far in excess of what was meant to be made” from the Brook House contract……”During those meetings profit margins at the end of the year that I left were declared at around 20% for the Brook House contract,” he said…..Mr Ward, who is now a priest, said people would be asked not to recruit staff in order to save money………”And actually the motive behind it for managers locally was that if you didn’t make the profit you didn’t get your bonus,” he said…….He added: “If you are not recruiting the staff you need you have to offer overtime to existing staff who are already working extraordinarily long shifts.”……..He said this put staff “under more stress” and made them less able to deal with people in their care in a “decent humane way” ………..The Home Office said it was “committed” to ensuring immigration removal centre contractors provided a high level of service to detainees and value for money to the taxpayer.“The G4S contract for Brook House and Tinsley House is no exception,” it said …….The Home Office said G4S, like other firms contracted by the government, were required to meet set service standards – including ensuring minimum staffing levels are met and providing quarterly financial reports to the Home Office and Cabinet Office…….It added: “Savings identified by G4S through smarter working practices have been, and continue to be, reported to the Home Office”……..After the BBC shared the slideshow with the Home Office, a spokesperson responded: “We do not recognise the profit margins quoted and they do not reflect those reported to the Home Office, which include all overheads and shared services.” …….The Home Office said it was “committed” to ensuring immigration removal centre contractors provided a high level of service to detainees and value for money to the taxpayer…….”The G4S contract for Brook House and Tinsley House is no exception,” it said …….The Home Office said G4S, like other firms contracted by the government, were required to meet set service standards – including ensuring minimum staffing levels are met and providing quarterly financial reports to the Home Office and Cabinet Office…..Callum Tulley, 21, agreed to go undercover at Brook House: Last week, an undercover investigation by BBC One’s Panorama showed staff working in Brook House Immigration Removal Centre under huge pressure – with drugs rife and self-harm common place amongst detainees awaiting deportation….A 21-year-old detainee custody officer, Callum Tulley, had become so concerned by what he was seeing he decided to blow the whistle…….Wearing a secret camera, he was able to capture on film a chaotic place……Some officers were doing their best in difficult circumstances, others were seen bullying, abusing, and in one case allegedly choking a detainee…….G4S has suspended 10 staff whilst it investigates the allegations made in the programme…….An 11th person, who now works for the Home Office, has also been suspended from his job……G4S made significant profits from running 2 UK immigration removal centres, documents seen by BBC suggest https://t.co/kBuks0BJi0— BBC News September 13, 2017 #AceNewsDesk reports are provided by Sterling Publishing & Media News

EDITOR: Thanks for following as always appreciate every like, reblog or retweet for all our daily news and minute by minute 24-hours a day on https://t.me/acenewsdaily and free help and guidance tips are on AcePCHelp.WordPress.Com or you can follow our news posts on AceBreakingNews.WordPress.Com or become a member on Telegram https://t.me/acebreakingnews

Challenging Our Free Right To Strike

Two women strikers on picket line during the &...

Two women strikers on picket line during the “Uprising of the 20,000”, garment workers strike, New York City. Strikes, ladies tailors, N.Y., Feb. 1910, picket girls on duty (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

I am not a person that believes in strike action per se but when it comes down to ” Free Rights ” l am firmly behind the people in their action’s! This is not just a case of preventing people striking it is the effect it will have on the way this country will look to the world, during the Olympic‘s! So my reason for posting this article from the Telegraph thanks to Ben Brogan being acknowledged. Is simply l do not believe that we have the right for the wrong reason to prevent anyone from striking for what they believe is their God-given right of ” Free Will”

 

BREAKING: Jeremy Hunt just spoke to Jim Naughtie on the Today programme about how the government is dealing with the Olympic security challenges and the planned strike action by border staff. He said the deployment of further troops to guard the security of the Games was not promoted by further failures by G4’s but simply because he didn’t want to “leave anything to chance”.

He stressed that G4’s failings were with the management not the workers, and that it was important not to “demonise” those working at the Games.

On the border strike, he said “we can be very confident of the provisions we have in place”, but added that he thought the eve of the Olympics was “the wrong time to strike”.

 

#g4s, #home-office, #injunction, #jeremy-hunt, #olympic, #olympic-games, #strike-action, #today