(WASHINGTON) Intercept Report: Beginning in 2019, the EPA stopped releasing crucial toxics reports. Even agency staffers have a hard time accessing them #AceNewsDesk report

#AceNewsReport – Nov.16: The Environmental Protection Agency has withheld information from the public since January 2019 about the dangers posed by more than 1,200 chemicals. By law, companies must give the EPA any evidence they possess that a chemical presents “a substantial risk of injury to health or the environment.” Until recently, the agency had been making these reports — known as 8(e) reports, for the section of the Toxic Substances Control Act that requires them — available to the public. In 2017, for instance, the EPA posted 481 substantial risk reports from industry on ChemView, a searchable public database of chemical information maintained by the agency. And in 2018, it added another 569 8(e) reports to the site. But since 2019, the EPA has only posted one of the reports to its public website.

#AceDailyNews says according to an Intercept News Report: EPA Withheld Reports of Substantial Risk Posed by 1,240 Chemicals…

Sharon Lerner
November 1 2021, 11:50 a.m.

Beginning in 2019, the EPA stopped releasing crucial toxics reports. Even agency staffers have a hard time accessing them.

During this time, chemical companies have continued to submit the critical studies to the agency, according to two EPA staff members with knowledge of the matter. Since January 2019, the EPA has received at least 1,240 reports documenting the risk of chemicals’ serious harms, including eye corrosion, damage to the brain and nervous system, chronic toxicity to honeybees, and cancer in both people and animals. PFAScompounds are among the chemical subjects of these notifications.

An EPA spokesperson acknowledged the problem in an emailed response to questions from The Intercept. “Due to overarching (staff and contractor) resource limitations, the agency was not able to continue the regular publication of 8(e) submissions in ChemView, a very manual process, after 1/1/2019.” The statement went on to note: “The TSCA program is underfunded. The previous Administration never asked Congress for the necessary resources to reflect the agency’s new responsibilities under amended TSCA. These shortfalls have implications that matter to all stakeholders, not just industry.” Despite the funding challenges, the EPA pledged to try to rectify the situation.

The Black Hole

Not only has the agency kept all but one of these reports from the public, but it has also made them difficult for EPA staff to access, according to the two agency scientists, who are choosing to remain anonymous because of concerns about possible retribution. The substantial risk reports have not been uploaded to the databases used most often by risk assessors searching for information about chemicals, according one of the EPA scientists, who has worked closely with the 8(e) statements. They have been entered only into an internal database that is difficult to access and search. As a result, little — and perhaps none — of the information about these serious risks to health and the environment has been incorporated into the chemical assessments completed during this period.

“The fact that these studies aren’t being included means there’s a very good chance there are some chemical assessments where we should have reached different conclusions,” said another EPA staff member who is familiar with the chemical assessment process. The information comes in the wake of evidence of dysfunction and corruption in the EPA’s Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics that five whistleblowers have provided to The Intercept, the EPA inspector general, and members of Congress since July. All five remain employed by the agency and are working with Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, or PEER, an organization that represents whistleblowers.

According to the emailed response from the agency, “EPA routinely uses all studies submitted to the agency, including 8e submissions, in TSCA new and existing chemical risk evaluations.” The statement acknowledged the difficulty of using the internal database, called CIS, on which the reports were loaded. “Some aspects of navigating CIS may be cumbersome, especially for assessors with less experience in doing so, and EPA has developed plans and proposals for updates and modernization, but their implementation has been hindered by a lack of resources,” it said.

The 1976 Toxic Substances Control Act clearly intended for the EPA to act on the information sent in by industry. And according to an agency spokesperson, each 8(e) submission is promptly reviewed and evaluated to determine the degree of concern that should be attached to it as well as recommendations for appropriate follow-up actions.

But the two EPA staff members who spoke with The Intercept said that the reports do not trigger an immediate response. “I would think most people in the public would assume that when we would get these reports, we give them incredible scrutiny and say, ‘Oh no! What are we going to do about this?’ But basically, they are just going into a black hole,” said one of the two scientists. “We don’t look at them. We don’t evaluate them. And we don’t check to see if they change our understanding of the chemical.”

In its response to The Intercept, the EPA disputed the scientists’ description of the process. “This is not a factual representation of how EPA deals with TSCA 8(e) submissions,” the agency spokesperson wrote, going on to say that agency staff do review the submissions to determine the “degree of concern.”

For decades, companies routinely claimed that much of the information in an 8(e) report could be declared confidential business information, allowing them to strike the name of the chemical from the report and making it impossible to address the harm. In 2010, the Obama administration changed course, announcing that it would begin reviewing the confidentiality claims and, if they were not legitimate, publicly post the reports along with compounds’ names.

The chemical industry pushed back against the policy, arguing that forcing companies to reveal the names of their compounds was a violation of their intellectual property rights. And close observers of the industry believe that pressure from companies that held this view was likely what led the Trump EPA to decide to stop publicly posting the reports.“It is not easy to keep selling your chemicals when people know they likely cause cancer or other serious disease.”

“It is not easy to keep selling your chemicals when people know they likely cause cancer or other serious disease,” said Eve Gartner, an attorney who manages the toxic exposure and health program at Earthjustice. “It makes perfect sense that in an EPA that was largely controlled by industry, chemical manufacturers would lobby to get EPA to stop releasing significant risk studies, and EPA would agree to keep this basic health and safety information secret.”

Gartner said it’s harder to understand why the Biden administration, which has repeatedly expressed its commitment to scientific integrity, has not already fixed the problem and made this backlogged health and safety information available to the public.

As the scientists who spoke with The Intercept see it, part of the explanation may be budgeting constraints. The Biden EPA was left with a situation that puts public health at risk and is expensive to fix. “The Trump administration created this huge backlog for them, and then it became just this intractable problem,” said one of the EPA scientists, who added that several other staff members have expressed concern about the problem.

In its response to The Intercept, the EPA spokesperson said the agency is planning to address the problem. “The Biden-Harris Administration has asked for significantly more resources for this program in the 2022 budget request to ensure we’re meeting our obligations under TSCA, most importantly protecting human health and the environment. In the future, as resources allow, EPA will continue to strive to make TSCA 8(e) reports publicly available in ChemView in the interest of increased transparency.”

While the Trump EPA stopped posting the 8(e) reports, it was also putting more resources into accommodating the companies the agency regulates, fast-tracking the approval of chemicals they considered high prioritypressuring risk assessors to downplay or ignore the risks presented by chemicals, and creating digital tools to ease the regulatory experience. “Together it shows EPA cares more about industry and getting their products out than it does about protecting human health and the environment,” said Kyla Bennett, director of science policy at PEER.

This photo taken Friday, June 15, 2018 near Fayetteville, N.C. shows the Chemours Company's PPA, or Polymer Processing Aid facility at the Fayetteville Works plant where the chemical known as GenX is produced. The chemical has been found in the Cape Fear River, a source of drinking water for much of the southeastern part of the state. (AP Photo/Gerry Broome)
Photo: Gerry Broome/AP

The Chemours facility at the Fayetteville Works plant, where the chemical known as GenX is produced, is seen on June 15, 2018, near Fayetteville, N.C.

Toxics, the Next Generation

Even before 2019, when the EPA was making the risk reports from industry publicly available, the agency did not always respond to the information in them with any urgency. In 2016, The Intercept reported on 16 8(e) reports that DuPont submitted to the EPA between 2006 and 2013. The reports detailed the potential dangers of GenX, a then-unknown PFAS compound that the company had introduced to replace another chemical in the same class, PFOA, which had been found to cause thyroid disease, cancers, and other health problems.

The studies showed that the replacement compound caused many of the same health problems in lab tests that the original chemical did, including cancer and reproductive problems. Although the studies were in the ChemView database, the EPA appeared to be unaware of them. The agency had made no public announcements about the information and had taken no actions to protect public health. As an agency employee said of the 8(e) reports to The Intercept at the time, “A lot of them do just get filed away.”

In 2019, The Intercept used the ChemView database to find 40 new PFAScompounds that had been the subject of 8(e) reports. Among the health effects listed in the animal studies the companies sent the agency were neurotoxicitydevelopmental toxicitydecreased conceptionsevere convulsionsbleeding in the lungs; tooth problemspost-natal losshair lossdepression of sperm function; abnormal development of skulls, ribs, and pelvises; and testicular, pancreatic, and kidney cancers. Despite the concerning reports, all 40 PFAS compounds were allowed onto the market and remain unregulated.

Last week, more than 15 years after DuPont submitted the first of those reports and more than five years after The Intercept first reported on them, the EPA took action on GenX using the 8(e) reports. On October 25, the agency released new toxicity assessments that found two closely related chemicals, both known as GenX, to be very toxic. The assessments were based largely on the information that DuPont sent the EPA in 8(e) reports years earlier. They also included information from a letter Chemours sent the EPA as an 8(e) report in March, which noted that approximately 80 percent of blood samples taken from workers at one of its plants outside the U.S. had tested positive for one of the two GenX compounds.In the years between the EPA’s receipt of the information about GenX’s toxicity and the assessment, the chemical was released into the drinking water of more than 1 million people in North Carolina.

“This science-based final assessment marks a critical step in the process of establishing a national drinking water health advisory for GenX chemicals and provides important information to our partners that can be used to protect communities where these chemicals are found,” said Radhika Fox, EPA assistant administrator for water, when announcing the finalized assessment.

Yet in the years between the EPA’s receipt of the information about GenX’s toxicity and the assessment, the chemical was released into the drinking water of more than 1 million people in North Carolina. As happened with PFOA and many of the new PFAS compounds introduced after GenX, the chemical was allowed to contaminate the environment and harm countless people — all while the EPA sat on information about its dangers.

A Toxic Pizza Tracker

In 2019, some of the EPA staff members who had been entering the 8(e) reports into the EPA’s public database were reassigned to another project. To help chemical companies track the progress of their products as they move through the approval process, the agency created an online tool that it refers to internally as a “pizza tracker,” which was launched later that year. According to a strategic plan of the Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, work on the pizza tracker is expected to continue through 2024.

While acknowledging that it prioritized the chemical tracking process and “that resources used to sanitize and post 8(e) submissions to ChemView … were reduced and eventually stopped,” the EPA denied that funding was “shifted specially” from posting the 8(e) reports to funding the pizza tracker.

Like the Domino’s app, the chemical-tracking tool is user-friendly, allowing companies to quickly and conveniently access information about their products as they move through the regulatory process. The two EPA scientists say that in order to protect public health, risk assessors need to be able to see the industry reports with the same ease. And, they say, taking resources away from protecting the public from health and environmental hazards while directing them toward the  improvement of industry’s experience of being regulated betrays misplaced priorities.

“The whole concept of a pizza tracker is that you’re delivering an order to a customer,” said one of the EPA scientists. “But the companies are not our clients, the public is.”

#AceNewsDesk report …………..Published: Nov.16: 2021:

Editor says …Sterling Publishing & Media Service Agency is not responsible for the content of external site or from any reports, posts or links, and can also be found here on Telegram: https://t.me/acenewsdaily all of our posts fromTwitter can be found here: https://acetwitternews.wordpress.com/ and all wordpress and live posts and links here: https://acenewsroom.wordpress.com/and thanks for following as always appreciate every like, reblog or retweet and free help and guidance tips on your PC software or need help & guidance from our experts AcePCHelp.WordPress.Com

#chemicals, #environment, #epa, #toxic, #washington

(WASHINGTON) EPA Statement Report: On June.16: 2021: Ordered eBay Inc of San Jose, Calif. to stop selling 170-unregistered and/or misbranded pesticides products in violation of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) #AceNewsDesk report

#AceNewsReport – June.19: Following up on tips and complaints from consumers and members of the regulated community, the EPA identified 170 pesticides on eBay.com that were either not registered with the Agency, labeled with false or misleading statements (misbranded), or both.

EPA News Release: ‘From Headquarters›Enforcement and Compliance Assurance (OECA) Issues Order to eBay to Stop Selling 170 Unregistered, Misbranded Pesticides and amended the Stop Sale Use or Removal Order issued to eBay on June 10, 2020 to include additional products following consumer complaints’

Also included in the amended order are pesticides that eBay failed to stop selling after the June 10, 2020 order such as Virus Shut Out, a purported spatial disinfection card that claims to protect the wearer from the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2).

06/17/2021Contact Information: EPA Press Office (press@epa.gov

“Unregistered pesticides can pose a serious hazard to human health and the environment,” said Larry Starfield, EPA acting assistant administrator for the Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance. “EPA remains committed to holding online retailers such as eBay accountable for the sale of these dangerous products through their websites.”

Through FIFRA, Congress tasked the EPA to regulate the production, sale, distribution, and use of pesticides in the United States. FIFRA makes it unlawful for any person to distribute or sell a pesticide that is not registered with the EPA or a pesticide with false or misleading labeling. The EPA is authorized to issue a stop sale use or removal order whenever a pesticide is found to be in violation of FIFRA’s requirements.

Among the pesticide products subject to the amended order is brodifacoum, a highly lethal anticoagulant poison with several links to human intoxication, and dichlorvos (aka DDVP), an organophosphate insecticide that has various restrictions and prohibited uses in the United States due to the dangers it presents to human health (EPA also classified DDVP as a probable human carcinogen).   

A bottle of Sniper DDVP dichlorvos

Recently, the EPA issued alerts to different members of the public including apartment building managers and superintendents, flight crews, customs and border protection agents, and the general public to increase awareness of the dangers posed by DDVP both in its application and transportation. 

A bottle of Virus Shut Out

To view the stop sale order, view: https://www.epa.gov/enforcement/amended-stop-sale-use-or-removal-order-issued-ebay-inc.

To make the public aware of the dangers of DDVP, EPA developed five fact sheets targeted to different audiences: https://www.epa.gov/pesticides/ddvp-fact-sheets.

For additional information on the coronavirus: www.epa.gov/coronavirus.

Members of the public can help protect our environment by identifying and reporting environmental violations. Learn more here: https://www.epa.gov/enforcement/report-environmental-violation-general-information

Editor says #AceNewsDesk reports by https://t.me/acenewsdaily and all our posts, also links can be found at here for Twitter and Live Feeds https://acenewsroom.wordpress.com/ and thanks for following as always appreciate every like, reblog or retweet and free help and guidance tips on your PC software or need help & guidance from our experts AcePCHelp.WordPress.Com

#ebay, #epa, #oeca, #pesticides, #washington

(WASHINGTON) #EPA Trump Administration: Seeking to roll back offshore drilling safety standards & allow fracking of tribal lands closing the door on Obamas era of rules & regulation standards in favour of #Oil & Gas Industries #AceNewsDesk reports

#AceNewsReport – Dec.29: Business first people second to make ‘ America Great Again ‘ but consequences for the ‘ Climate & Environment ‘ is much greater for America than just #ProfitB4People it’s ‘ The Beginning of the End ‘ but 2020 is dawning soon #AceNewsDesk reports

Trump to repeal Obama fracking rule The Trump administration will take its final step to repeal the Obama administration’s 2015 rule setting standards for hydraulic fracturing on federal land.A formal notice from the Interior Department’s Bureau of Land Management (BLM) ….The Trump administration seeks to roll back offshore drilling safety standards of some of a wide-ranging Obama-era regulation that was meant to improve the safety of offshore oil and natural gas drilling……….The proposed rollbacks by the Interior Department’s Bureau of Safety and Environment Court won’t reconsider dismissing case against Obama fracking rule according to an appeals court declined Wednesday to reconsider its September decision that undid a previous court ruling overturning the Obama administration’s fracking rule for federal land………..In a brief order that didn’t come with an explanation, the Denver-based company ……USA – Voice of America reports http://ift.tt/2CkoKvH President Donald Trump’s administration is rescinding proposed rules for hydraulic fracturing and other oil- and gas-drilling practices on government lands, government officials announced Thursday:…………The rules developed under President Barack Obama would have applied mainly in the West, where most federal lands are located………..Companies would have had to disclose the chemicals used in fracking, which pumps pressurized water underground to break open hydrocarbon deposits……………The rules to be rescinded Friday were supposed to take effect in 2015, but a federal judge in Wyoming blocked them at the last minute. In September, the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver declined to rule in that case because the Trump administration intended to rescind the rules……………Industry praise the long-awaited change drew praise from industry groups including the Washington, D.C.-based Independent Petroleum Association of America and Denver-based Western Energy Alliance, which sued to block the rules………..They claimed the federal rules would have duplicated state rules, putting unnecessary and expensive burdens on petroleum developers. “States have an exemplary safety record regulating fracking, and that environmental protection will continue as before,” Western Energy Alliance President Kathleen Sgamma said in a release…………Fracking and water Fracking has been so successful in boosting production over the past decade it has become almost synonymous with oil and gas drilling. In many areas, it would be rare nowadays for a gas or oil well to not be fracked…….The process requires several million gallons of water each time….Environmentalists say the potential risks to groundwater require regulation. “Fracking is a toxic business, and that’s why states and countries have banned it Trump’s reckless decision to repeal these common-sense protections will have serious consequences,” Brett Hartl, government affairs director at the Centre for Biological Diversity, said in an email…..

Editor says #AceNewsDesk reports & #Brittius says are provided by Sterling Publishing & Media News and all our posts, links can be found at here https://t.me/acenewsdaily and thanks for following as always appreciate every like, reblog or retweet and free help and guidance tips on your PC software or need help & guidance from our experts AcePCHelp.WordPress.Com or you can follow our breaking news posts on AceBreakingNews.WordPress.Com or become a member on Telegram https://t.me/acebreakingnews


#BREAKING144 ‘ EPA Aircraft emissions endanger peoples lives ‘

#AceBreakingNews – WASHINGTON:June.10: (WASHINGTON EXAMINER) The Environmental Protection Agency announced Wednesday that emissions from commercial jets cause climate change, endangering the public’s health and welfare.

“Today’s action supports the goals of the President’s Climate Action Plan to reduce emissions from large sources of carbon pollution,” the EPA said in a press release.

The announcement is the first step in regulating the emissions from commercial airlines that most scientists say are to blame for manmade climate change. The regulations fall in step with the agency’s efforts to regulate the emissions from cars, trucks and power plants.

The EPA says it is excluding military and smaller aircraft from the regulations.


#aircraft, #climate-change, #emission-standard, #emissions, #environmental-protection-agency, #epa, #global-warming, #greenhouse-gas, #health, #international-civil-aviation-organization, #power-station, #reciprocating-engine, #united-states-environmental-protection-agency


#AceWorldNews – WASHINGTON – Nov.27 – The Obama administration unveiled an ambitious plan Wednesday that it said would improve public health by slashing the ozone pollution that causes smog The Hill reported. 

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Gina McCarthy framed the update to the ground-level ozone standard as an imperative, bringing agency rules in line with the latest science to protect the nation’s most vulnerable populations from a range of respiratory illnesses including asthma.


#asthma, #epa, #illnesses, #respiratory-diseases

EPA’s TOP CLIMATE CHANGE EXPERT, John C. Beale, CONVICTED of fraud “of massive proportion”

#AceEnvironmentNews says “Could Not Happen To a Nicer Guy” #EPA

#climate-change, #convicted, #expert

Running Out Of Money – No We should Just Mint More – Oh We Can’t

The EPA is in the middle of a number of regulatory actions that could be affected by a government shut-down. On Friday, the agency proposed to set a limit on carbon emissions from coal and natural gas power plants. Also last week, it published a report laying out its authority to regulate brooks, streams and other small bodies of water.http://thehill.com/blogs/regwatch/administration/323933-shutdown-would-shutter-epa-chief-says-

#acenewsservices, #epa, #government, #us-government